anyway a 90 degree flip would have left a huge amount of evidence.
I dont recall people finding fossilized life forms from extreme cold climates in any of the temperate zones on Earth.
When they test Ice Cores and drill very deep, how many years does it go back in time?
And when was the last "pole flip" according to Ben Davidson? Would those massive ice sheets not have melted if they where in the tropics suddenly? And new ones form in the new poles instead?
As more interested & enjoying moreso being bogged down in Reads & Shares, and i'd made iT clear iT would require maybe a month +/- ~ to eventually have got iT into the brains' stomach, yet also needs to be digested or , worriedly, somewhere in the need of a Meclizine to keep me from onset vertigo. However at my first glance - I did not feel iT needed to be as big a demand of time that I worked = worried , iT might be. Thanks to my keeping up on others continuum of their bantered replies with The Source of the Articles to they'd presented, I further had curtailed by my feel to the comments of those, the majority of the SKANners. And TY, Ben for lobbing it all more correctly on that matter.
Truly, ~ me... Paul of the DDD in Sonoma Co. / NorCal. .................^j=* ''yeah ~ that'guy!''
Ben said in a live stream that he uses 90 degrees because it's an easier number for noobs to wrap their minds around vs giving a range of 30-105 degrees. Though as you pointed out, he makes very specific predictions about the new pole positions. Huh. Very interesting.
When researching, the pole positions were the one thing I couldn't find evidence for. I admit I didn't try too terribly hard to find evidence either as I don't have an interest in the science (just survival), and wasn't quite sure where I should be looking for breadcrumbs.
Thank you! Thank you! THANK YOU for being willing to ask questions AND find answers. I'll be pinning your points to my mental corkboard.
At the end of the day, the evidence of a catastrophe cycle is clear to me. No matter the degree of tilt, I'm headed for the Rockies with laminated copies of your evidence AND Ben's for future generations to ponder.
Ben completely not addressing that the “Rand math” model has not panned out with the path of the poles since nanook happened is unfortunate. Because that seems to be his biggest source.
If he doesn't revise the references in his books/publications for the “alternating polar tropical fossil layers” under the arctic ice, we should definitely start asking more questions. Misattributed/missing info in citations is a liability to his personal and professional credibility.
Pretty sure you wont hear from him again.
anyway a 90 degree flip would have left a huge amount of evidence.
I dont recall people finding fossilized life forms from extreme cold climates in any of the temperate zones on Earth.
When they test Ice Cores and drill very deep, how many years does it go back in time?
And when was the last "pole flip" according to Ben Davidson? Would those massive ice sheets not have melted if they where in the tropics suddenly? And new ones form in the new poles instead?
As more interested & enjoying moreso being bogged down in Reads & Shares, and i'd made iT clear iT would require maybe a month +/- ~ to eventually have got iT into the brains' stomach, yet also needs to be digested or , worriedly, somewhere in the need of a Meclizine to keep me from onset vertigo. However at my first glance - I did not feel iT needed to be as big a demand of time that I worked = worried , iT might be. Thanks to my keeping up on others continuum of their bantered replies with The Source of the Articles to they'd presented, I further had curtailed by my feel to the comments of those, the majority of the SKANners. And TY, Ben for lobbing it all more correctly on that matter.
Truly, ~ me... Paul of the DDD in Sonoma Co. / NorCal. .................^j=* ''yeah ~ that'guy!''
Ben said in a live stream that he uses 90 degrees because it's an easier number for noobs to wrap their minds around vs giving a range of 30-105 degrees. Though as you pointed out, he makes very specific predictions about the new pole positions. Huh. Very interesting.
When researching, the pole positions were the one thing I couldn't find evidence for. I admit I didn't try too terribly hard to find evidence either as I don't have an interest in the science (just survival), and wasn't quite sure where I should be looking for breadcrumbs.
Thank you! Thank you! THANK YOU for being willing to ask questions AND find answers. I'll be pinning your points to my mental corkboard.
At the end of the day, the evidence of a catastrophe cycle is clear to me. No matter the degree of tilt, I'm headed for the Rockies with laminated copies of your evidence AND Ben's for future generations to ponder.
Ben completely not addressing that the “Rand math” model has not panned out with the path of the poles since nanook happened is unfortunate. Because that seems to be his biggest source.
If he doesn't revise the references in his books/publications for the “alternating polar tropical fossil layers” under the arctic ice, we should definitely start asking more questions. Misattributed/missing info in citations is a liability to his personal and professional credibility.